In partnership with
This is not a political story.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was asked a simple question on Fox Business. If he were a young college graduate facing today's job market, what would he do.
His answer was direct.
"I don't know what job I would go into. But I can tell you, I would be trained up in AI. What I would do is become an AI native."
A man worth more than $500 million, whose own portfolio includes farmland and other hard assets, looked at the current job market and said the single most important skill a young person can develop right now is fluency in artificial intelligence.
That is not a policy statement. It is a market observation from someone whose entire career has been built on reading markets correctly before the crowd does.
And it tells you something important about where to look with your own money.
The 10 Best AI Stocks to Own in 2026
AI is moving from experiment… to essential.
Every major industry is integrating it.
Every major company is investing in it.
By late 2025, AI was already an $800B market — growing at a pace that could push it well beyond $1 trillion in the years ahead.
Cloud infrastructure is scaling fast.
AI-enabled devices are multiplying.
Automation is becoming standard.
But here’s the real question…
When trillions flow into this transformation — which stocks stand to benefit most?
Our new report reveals 10 AI stocks positioned across the backbone of this shift — from the companies powering the infrastructure… to those embedding intelligence into everyday systems.
If you want exposure to one of the defining growth trends of this decade, start here.
The Numbers Behind the Warning.
Here is why Bessent's comment landed the way it did.
AI was directly cited as a reason for nearly 55,000 job cuts in 2025 alone.
The unemployment rate for recent college graduates climbed to nearly 6% by the end of last year. One US Senator has publicly projected that number could reach 25% within five years if the current trend continues.
Dario Amodei, CEO of the AI company Anthropic, told Axios that nearly half of all entry-level white-collar jobs could be obsolete within five years.
Goldman Sachs, one of the most conservative and methodical research shops on Wall Street, estimates that up to 14% of global jobs could be disrupted by AI under reasonable assumptions about how quickly the technology improves.
One in seven jobs on earth. That is the scale Goldman Sachs is putting on this.
These are not fringe predictions from people trying to sell you something. These are statements from a sitting Treasury Secretary, a Democratic Senator, the CEO of one of the most consequential AI companies on the planet, and the research division of one of the largest investment banks in the world.
When that many serious people with that much credibility are all pointing in the same direction, the prudent response is not to argue about politics.
It is to ask what it means for where capital should be positioned.
Why This Matters for You. Not Just New Graduates.
Here is the bridge between a story about 22-year-old job seekers and your retirement portfolio.
Every technological shift in history that disrupted how people work has also dramatically reshaped where wealth concentrated.
The printing press did not just change how information moved. It changed which businesses became valuable.
The railroad did not just change how goods moved. It created an entirely new category of enormous companies, and an entirely new category of companies that quietly disappeared.
The internet did not just change how people communicated. It created Amazon, Google, and Microsoft, while simultaneously erasing entire industries that failed to adapt.
Every single one of those shifts created two groups of investors.
The ones who recognized early that capital needed to follow the disruption, and positioned a portion of their portfolio toward the companies building the new infrastructure.
And the ones who waited until the shift was obvious to everyone, by which point the easiest gains had already been captured by the first group.
Bessent is telling young workers to get ahead of the disruption with their skills.
The exact same principle applies to your portfolio.
What Replaces Roundup?
The next agricultural transition may not be bigger tractors. It may be autonomous robots replacing herbicides entirely. Greenfield Robotics is building commercial systems designed for that future.
Greenfield Robotics is Testing The Waters under tier 2 of Regulation A. No money or other consideration is being solicited, and if sent in response will not be accepted. No offer to buy the securities can be accepted and no part of the purchase price can be received until the offering statement filed by the company with the SEC has been qualified by the SEC. Any such offer may be withdrawn or revoked, without obligation or commitment of any kind, at any time before notice of acceptance given after the date of qualification. An indication of interest involves no obligation or commitment of any kind. “Reserving” shares is simply an indication of interest. There is no binding commitment for investors that reserve shares in this manner to ultimately invest and purchase the shares reserved of the company, or to purchase any shares of the company whatsoever.
The Part Bessent Did Not Say Out Loud.
Here is something worth noticing.
Bessent himself is not worried about his own career being disrupted by AI. His personal portfolio, according to public disclosures, includes meaningful holdings in farmland and other hard, tangible assets.
That is not a coincidence. It reflects a particular way of thinking about uncertainty.
When the future of an entire category of work is genuinely unclear, experienced capital allocators tend to do two things simultaneously. They position a portion of their resources toward the technology causing the disruption, because that is where the new value is being created. And they keep a meaningful portion in tangible, productive assets that hold value regardless of how the disruption unfolds.
Offense and ballast. At the same time. Not one instead of the other.
That is not a partisan strategy. It is simply how people who have successfully navigated previous technological disruptions have approached the uncertainty each time.
The Number Worth Running for Yourself.
Here is a simple exercise that takes two minutes.
Say you have a $500,000 portfolio. Say you decided, after reading everything above, that a modest 5% allocation toward AI-exposed companies and infrastructure made sense as part of an otherwise diversified strategy.
That is $25,000.
The Nasdaq 100, the index most heavily weighted toward the companies building this technology, has returned an average of approximately 13% per year over the last 15 years, including every crash and correction along the way.
$25,000 compounding at that historical average for 10 years becomes approximately $84,800.
Compare that to the same $25,000 sitting in a savings account earning 0.5% over the same 10 years. It becomes approximately $26,300.
The difference is $58,500.
On a position that represents just 5% of the original portfolio.
Now widen the lens. The other 95% of that $500,000 stays exactly where your financial plan already has it. Your guaranteed income floor untouched. Your diversified core holdings untouched. Your risk profile barely moved.
That is the entire idea. Not betting the farm on a single technology. Sizing a thoughtful position and letting the math of the largest economic transformation in a generation work in the background, the same way it has worked for every prior transformation that came before it.
What an Empowered Retiree Does With This Information.
You are not job hunting. The 25% unemployment projection for new graduates does not apply to your household directly.
But the underlying signal applies to every portfolio, regardless of age.
A technology this consequential, validated by this many credible and otherwise unaligned voices, from a sitting Treasury Secretary to a Democratic Senator to the CEO of a leading AI lab to Goldman Sachs research, is not a trend to watch from a distance.
It is a trend to have some thoughtful exposure to, sized appropriately, as part of a portfolio that is otherwise anchored by your guaranteed income floor and your diversified core holdings.
You do not need to become an AI native the way a 22-year-old job seeker does.
But you do need to ask whether any portion of your portfolio is positioned to benefit from the most significant economic transformation currently underway, or whether your capital is sitting entirely on the sidelines of it.
That is not a political question.
It is the same question every generation of investors has had to answer when a transformation this large arrived.
The people who answered it thoughtfully, with proper sizing and proper diversification, tend to look back on these moments with satisfaction.
The people who ignored the signal entirely tend to look back wondering what they missed.
Stay sharp.
— US Retirement Report
You Don't Have to Wait for the SpaceX IPO
The listing is coming. But the investors who'll profit most aren't waiting — they're already in the three public companies with direct SpaceX revenue exposure. Here's what they're buying.
This newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, tax, or investment advice. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any decisions.
Move this email to your Primary inbox so you never miss a daily briefing. On mobile: tap the three dots. Move to Primary.